Opinions on US PATRIOT Act of 2001

On October 26, 2001 President George W. Bush signed the US nationalist playact of 2001; making it a natural natural law. The word patriot in the patriot Act is an acronym that spells out Providing Appropriate Tools Required to blockade and obstruct Terrorism. The name big(p)s pretty nice make headway the invoice; however, in my opinion is like one of those things that sound ruin in your head. I am not at either knocking the United States whatsoever, but for so some long time we have had all this freedom and out redress all of sudden we ar losing it ever so slowly. The nationalist Act amend over fifteen statutes, including the laws governing brutal procedure, computer impostor and abuse, foreign intelligence, wiretapping, immigration, and the laws governing the privacy of pupil records. These amendments expanded the indorsement of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and law enforcement to gain entrée to business records, medical records, educational reco rds and subroutine library records, including stored electronic information and communications. It also expanded the laws governing wiretaps and trammel and trace telephone devices to Internet and electronic communications. (www.ala.org - usapatriotactlibrary) Although this newfound law is suppose to tending law enforcement agencies prevent other terrorist attacks on the United States, they are destroying the freedom the citizens in this country once relied on. The threat of act of terrorism itself should not be employ as an excuse for the disposal to invade our constitutional and gracious rights.

I fee l that this new law contradicts the Fifth Am! endment, stating that The right of the people to be bulletproof in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against un agreementable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall departure, but upon probable cause... The new law allows law enforcement agencies access to issue a search warrant straightway if there is reason to... Your essay is too biased why not scram to one side, u cant eat ur legal community and have it back. If the make do against terrorist affects individual personal life, I see no fracture in it, if the law require to keep us off the hook(predicate) from terrorism affects our privacy then(prenominal) why not throw dine with the devil u hit the hay than the angel we dont know? If you want to protrude a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay , visit our page: cheap essay